Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Jun 9, 2013 21:12:36 GMT -8
I gave up on price targets months ago. Visibility _should_ improve but for now, it's nil IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by sponge on Jun 9, 2013 21:50:31 GMT -8
Mercel
I have much more faith in Apple then most. I recall in 1997 wondering how long I would keep my Apple computer even after the company went under. I just wish I had the balls to invest in 2001. I won't make that mistake again.
Apple is an investment of a generation. My grand kids will thank me. It's much more then a tech company. Few understand that.
IBM and GE were great investments back in 1950 and they continue today.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 22:27:00 GMT -8
Ya, and how would you have done if you had only bought and held instead of buying on margin and purchasing options?? Instead you bought high and sold low. Anybody that's logging into this forum for more than 3 months knows how everybody else has been doing. I disagree with much of what Sponge posts, but he's always taken responsibility for his losses. He has never blamed others, like some here have done (blaming management). So what's the point of your post, other than rubbing in someone else's misfortune?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 22:29:23 GMT -8
Futures of all US indexes and the Nikkei are GREEN. It would be nice to know how DAX and FTSE Futures are doing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2013 22:42:05 GMT -8
The WSJ and NYT have a axe to grind against Apple. Does Murdoch still swing at Apple over The Daily fiasco? What is with the NYT? Not enough advertising? Do both expect Apple is going to disrupt their industry in a bigger way? The negative bias is so obvious there MUST be some motivation behind it. Well, as far as the NYT goes, is losing subscribers and ad revenues...fast.
|
|