Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,766
|
Post by Mav on May 4, 2014 22:58:52 GMT -5
Schematics and iPad mini-looking concepts that retain the same general "phone face" of the 5S, just scaled up? Eh.
If a major rumor/media outlet reports something solid about a release date, I'll start believing the cadence is shifting.
|
|
marcellus
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by marcellus on May 5, 2014 0:06:27 GMT -5
Schematics and iPad mini-looking concepts that retain the same general "phone face" of the 5S, just scaled up? Eh. If a major rumor/media outlet reports something solid about a release date, I'll start believing the cadence is shifting. I think we've seen more than that. But as I said, I'm not predicting it at WWDC....just going for clicks and hits here.  |
|
|
|
Post by yellowhandman on May 5, 2014 3:50:09 GMT -5
For those who commented that Apples award probably isn't even enough to pay for legal fees. Please use that perspective from Samsung's POV. Their legal fees IMO were probably even higher than Apple's (due to law firm EQ's highest reputation, and the fact Samsung defense required the huge addition of patent invalidity pursuits). So Samsung pays $120m and $120m legal fees. Normally orders as to legal costs are separate from the damages awarded. So Apple wouldn't be using the award to pay legal fees. In most cases, the winning party gets its cost paid for by the loser. Please note that I practice law in Singapore, not the US. So I may be totally wrong on this. |
|
|
|
Post by Lstream on May 5, 2014 7:04:25 GMT -5
For those who commented that Apples award probably isn't even enough to pay for legal fees. Please use that perspective from Samsung's POV. Their legal fees IMO were probably even higher than Apple's (due to law firm EQ's highest reputation, and the fact Samsung defense required the huge addition of patent invalidity pursuits). So Samsung pays $120m and $120m legal fees. Normally orders as to legal costs are separate from the damages awarded. So Apple wouldn't be using the award to pay legal fees. In most cases, the winning party gets its cost paid for by the loser. Please note that I practice law in Singapore, not the US. So I may be totally wrong on this. Almost certain this is not correct in the US. |
|
