|
Post by tuffett on Dec 2, 2017 9:13:04 GMT -8
As a Canadian with large US holdings, this is great news for me. I’d be less pleased if I or my loved ones were American and vulnerable to the negative impacts of the more repugnant portions of the bill.
|
|
|
Post by Luckychoices on Dec 2, 2017 10:01:01 GMT -8
|
|
JDSoCal
Member
Aspiring oligarch
Posts: 4,189
|
Post by JDSoCal on Dec 2, 2017 12:53:09 GMT -8
Hilarious ... they got nothing on Trump. As if “collusion” is even a crime anyway. ... “Did Trump team plan to reward Russians for election meddling? 5:31 PM EST December 1, 2017 CNN What Mueller may really be looking for here is proof of a "quid pro quo" promise to ease up on sanctions to reward the Russians for assisting the Trump campaign in trashing Hillary Clinton during the presidential election. If Flynn could provide evidence of such an election-tampering deal made with knowledge of the President, impeachment proceedings would be inevitable.” Hilarious. This just defies all logic. Trump was hitting "Corrupt" Hillary hard daily with his tweets that got widespread media coverage. Why on earth would Trump need some Russian ads on Facebook? When "Corrupt" Hillary was in the news daily for legit bad acts like wiping email servers? There are a million legal ways to run attack ads, so why this convoluted cloak-and-dagger Russia fantasy? What could Russia do that Team Trump couldn't? Trump was traveling to up to 3 states a day. A supremely confident guy to the point of his enemies calling him a narcissist, but Trump was secretly insecure that he wouldn't win without some obscure Russian attack ads? The idea that he'd take the time out to waste on this doesn't pass the laugh test. I haven't even seen a single person say they voted because of some Russian ad. It was Team Hillary who paid for the fake dossier on Trump, BTW. And I think you've forgotten who controls the Congress. And I doubt Dems are dumb enough to try to stage a coup and undo the election, even if they took back both houses in 2019. At a time when the economy will probably be booming due to these tax cuts. Then they'd get one of the most socially conservative presidents in history, Mike Pence. And some really pissed off voters. Good luck with that brilliant plan! For the record, I thought the impeachment of Clinton was a bad idea. Let's bring home our money!
|
|
|
Post by david on Dec 2, 2017 19:16:56 GMT -8
“Did Trump team plan to reward Russians for election meddling? 5:31 PM EST December 1, 2017 CNN What Mueller may really be looking for here is proof of a "quid pro quo" promise to ease up on sanctions to reward the Russians for assisting the Trump campaign in trashing Hillary Clinton during the presidential election. If Flynn could provide evidence of such an election-tampering deal made with knowledge of the President, impeachment proceedings would be inevitable.” Hilarious. This just defies all logic. Trump was hitting "Corrupt" Hillary hard daily with his tweets that got widespread media coverage. Why on earth would Trump need some Russian ads on Facebook? When "Corrupt" Hillary was in the news daily for legit bad acts like wiping email servers? There are a million legal ways to run attack ads, so why this convoluted cloak-and-dagger Russia fantasy? What could Russia do that Team Trump couldn't? Trump was traveling to up to 3 states a day. A supremely confident guy to the point of his enemies calling him a narcissist, but Trump was secretly insecure that he wouldn't win without some obscure Russian attack ads? The idea that he'd take the time out to waste on this doesn't pass the laugh test. I haven't even seen a single person say they voted because of some Russian ad. It was Team Hillary who paid for the fake dossier on Trump, BTW. And I think you've forgotten who controls the Congress. And I doubt Dems are dumb enough to try to stage a coup and undo the election, even if they took back both houses in 2019. At a time when the economy will probably be booming due to these tax cuts. Then they'd get one of the most socially conservative presidents in history, Mike Pence. And some really pissed off voters. Good luck with that brilliant plan! For the record, I thought the impeachment of Clinton was a bad idea. Let's bring home our money! Thanks. Nice to know what the core 38% are thinking. The other 62% fear he’s a Russian-money launderer under Putin’s thumb. They wonder why he acts like a guilty man. But yes, let’s bring home the money. Amen.
|
|
mark
fire starter
Posts: 1,575
|
Post by mark on Dec 2, 2017 20:44:43 GMT -8
I don't really even want to know what you're *attempting* to indicate with these two sentences but suggest you be more careful with the use of "everyone" and "we". Clearly "everyone" didn't think it was bad because he won the electoral college vote. And to add, "We know a few days later how that turned out" is judging *very* prematurely about "how that turned out". True Speaking only about market reaction over a short period. Trump is providing volatility to the market in ways no other president has in the past. We will go up and down in the next 7 years. Apple will be just fine as it has over many other presidents. True. I've read that since election day 2016, volatility is at all-time lows.
|
|