|
Post by aapl4kiki on May 14, 2013 10:06:23 GMT -8
As LMIP has said - we usually fill all gaps. We've had quite a few during this melt-up.
|
|
|
Post by macwire on May 14, 2013 10:11:28 GMT -8
Pathetic
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on May 14, 2013 10:13:25 GMT -8
As LMIP has said - we usually fill all gaps. We've had quite a few during this melt-up. May 3 and May 6 gaps filled. There aren't any other big enough gaps that necessitate filling IMO.
|
|
|
Post by aapl4kiki on May 14, 2013 10:15:31 GMT -8
As LMIP has said - we usually fill all gaps. We've had quite a few during this melt-up. May 3 and May 6 gaps filled. What is left? May 2? Anything else?
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on May 14, 2013 10:16:07 GMT -8
May 3 and May 6 gaps filled. What is left? May 2? Anything else? There are a couple of little ones. But they're all <0.5%.
|
|
|
Post by lance on May 14, 2013 10:16:14 GMT -8
Never try to fight the BB reversal. It happens everytime. When we hit the top we reverse for a couple weeks.
|
|
|
Post by Nevyn on May 14, 2013 10:18:10 GMT -8
I'm nibbling here. I think there will be a run up to wwdc and into the fall. I am building a position to restart covered call writing.
|
|
|
Post by sponge on May 14, 2013 10:22:07 GMT -8
I bought more 550calls at 8. These are the ones I sold last week at 10.75.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2013 10:22:26 GMT -8
Wasn't that the same thing that happened to Blackberry? No it was not. Blackberry Management ignored and/or fought two major industry developments. 1. UI disruption - massive switch away from keypads and to Touch. 2. The App revolution - sneered at by Balsillie when he called it "tonnage". Those two blunders are not even in the same league as an allegedly "stale" OS. No, but thinking "everything is great" is the same thing that happened to Blackberry...not keeping an eye on trends and innovating. They should be updating iWork, keeping iOS fresh and up to date, releasing 4.5 and 5" screens (I'm sorry, but why not have a iPhone 5 Plus and at a 4.5" or 5" screen? Give some options to consumers who obviously value larger screens. There's a reason the stock has dropped 40%...Apple's market share and profit share are both shrinking. Obviously they don't want to fight the race to the bottom, but there are trends like large screens that consumers want that they're ignoring. It took 3 years of demand for a 7" iPad for the Mini to be released...are we going to wait another 2 years before a 4.5" iPhone is released? The iPhone 5 was a good step, but it was late and still too small in my mind, I'd prefer a 4.5" screen. Not everyone would though, so why not have 2 or 3 options?
|
|
|
Post by seabiscuit on May 14, 2013 10:30:29 GMT -8
Anyone have a solid reason whle all of a sudden Apple is dropping?
|
|
|
Post by joel90069 on May 14, 2013 10:39:34 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on May 14, 2013 10:41:21 GMT -8
Anyone have a solid reason whle all of a sudden Apple is dropping? Stops at 450.48. Seriously.
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on May 14, 2013 10:42:30 GMT -8
No. If you go looking for "news" to attribute to changes in stock price, you'll always find it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2013 10:48:49 GMT -8
No. If you go looking for "news" to attribute to changes in stock price, you'll always find it. Exactly, its just machines selling...
|
|
|
Post by macwire on May 14, 2013 11:09:00 GMT -8
No. If you go looking for "news" to attribute to changes in stock price, you'll always find it. It's a broken stock that hasn't reversed trend. Please note I did not say broken company.
|
|
|
Post by lance on May 14, 2013 11:10:48 GMT -8
The market is so far ahead of itself right now. It is setting itself up for what happened Apple in September. Too High too Fast. It can't sustain these mutliple percentage moves everyday. Goldmans end of year target is 1625 we are already at 1650 on S&P. That is too much too fast. Meanwhile AAPL is trading on its own.
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on May 14, 2013 11:12:04 GMT -8
No. If you go looking for "news" to attribute to changes in stock price, you'll always find it. It's a broken stock that hasn't reversed trend. Please note I did not say broken company. Just because we've retraced 23 points from the high doesn't mean the trend hasn't reversed. It was 73 points from the bottom of our last noteworthy retrace. This is still in the healthy zone.
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on May 14, 2013 11:18:01 GMT -8
Div-adjusted Fib targets close by: 444-ish, 433.
Also watching 445, 450. Will monthly OI change much before Friday?
|
|
|
Post by mace on May 14, 2013 11:28:21 GMT -8
Should consider trend is reversed unless the 20-day/50-day SMA, currently around $431, don't hold. Expect the 20-day/50-day EMA, currently around $439, to hold. For those who follow channel, AAPL is still not at the lower channel line yet, around $440.
Do worry only if AAPL drops below $428.
|
|
|
Post by rutgersguy92 on May 14, 2013 11:30:36 GMT -8
Div-adjusted Fib targets close by: 444-ish, 433. Also watching 445, 450. Will monthly OI change much before Friday? Also have a gap at 445. How've you been, Mav?
|
|
|
Post by rutgersguy92 on May 14, 2013 11:32:36 GMT -8
Should consider trend is reversed unless the 20-day/50-day SMA, currently around $431, don't hold. I think you mean, consider the trend not reversed, unless the 20 and 50 do not hold, in which case it is reversed. Right, Mace?
|
|
|
Post by mace on May 14, 2013 11:37:27 GMT -8
Should consider trend is reversed unless the 20-day/50-day SMA, currently around $431, don't hold. I think you mean, consider the trend not reversed, unless the 20 and 50 do not hold, in which case it is reversed. Right, Mace? Depend on what you think the trend is now. The trend has been down since $705 and I consider the trend is up since $385 i.e. trend is reverse since $385.
|
|
|
Post by macwire on May 14, 2013 11:38:31 GMT -8
It's a broken stock that hasn't reversed trend. Please note I did not say broken company. Just because we've retraced 23 points from the high doesn't mean the trend hasn't reversed. It was 73 points from the bottom of our last noteworthy retrace. This is still in the healthy zone. Yeah still in a healthy retrace. I concede that with the one caveat being that I doubt it maintains relative strength WHEN the market retraces some of its gains. Opinions are like ... well you know. Lol. Just trading trend and raising stops. Got stopped out today of a 2 week position. Coulda woulda at 460 for a nice +200 but it is what it is. Ill book my profit and eye another re-entry when it sets up. Dislike going long if its under its 10dma ...
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on May 14, 2013 11:39:29 GMT -8
There are so many ways to measure and determine trend, but the 420s should make most uptrend types (like me) a little nervous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2013 11:40:33 GMT -8
once again today we see money flowing from aapl to everyone else. Market is up while we are down. The good news is that we are down a fraction and volume is very light. No one wants to sell nor buy at this time. Went ahead and bought more calls. I am thinking we are at the lows of the week and we should see sunnier days next week after dividend is reinvested and OE is behind us. Then we look forward to the digital conf speech from TC and then WWDC. I put in what was supposed to be a stink bid for Weekly $440/$445 BCS. I got them on AAPL's way down to $442. I could have got them for $1.75 less. Ugh.
|
|
|
Post by macwire on May 14, 2013 11:43:06 GMT -8
Should consider trend is reversed unless the 20-day/50-day SMA, currently around $431, don't hold. Expect the 20-day/50-day EMA, currently around $439, to hold. For those who follow channel, AAPL is still not at the lower channel line yet, around $440. Do worry only if AAPL drops below $428. That's where I'm eyeing re entry. I just was looking a gift horse in the mouth too long to not take some coin off. Also cautious about the markets as well in general even if I'm still long (albeit at smaller and smaller position sizes when I go long)
|
|
|
Post by rutgersguy92 on May 14, 2013 12:30:41 GMT -8
I think you mean, consider the trend not reversed, unless the 20 and 50 do not hold, in which case it is reversed. Right, Mace? Depend on what you think the trend is now. The trend has been down since $705 and I consider the trend is up since $385 i.e. trend is reverse since $385. The trend has been up, so this is just a healthy re-trace. If we pass the 20 & 50, then I think we start thinking that this might be another reversal, like we had in early December at 590ish. There is a similarity to that reversal, since then we had trouble getting past that 590-ish number, and here we couldn't get past the 465ish (both 100 day SMA's I think).
|
|
|
Post by phoebear611 on May 14, 2013 12:40:56 GMT -8
The auction for a coffee meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook has ended. The winning bid? $610,000
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on May 14, 2013 12:51:46 GMT -8
Depend on what you think the trend is now. The trend has been down since $705 and I consider the trend is up since $385 i.e. trend is reverse since $385. The trend has been up, so this is just a healthy re-trace. If we pass the 20 & 50, then I think we start thinking that this might be another reversal, like we had in early December at 590ish. There is a similarity to that reversal, since then we had trouble getting past that 590-ish number, and here we couldn't get past the 465ish (both 100 day SMA's I think). We picked a crappy place to retrace, which is why people are getting worried again. Couldn't hold the 100 day and couldn't quite get to 469. Those are two HUGE obstacles that need to come down.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2013 12:52:47 GMT -8
It'd be very simple to have a "classic iOS" option like Microsoft does with Windows 7 and Classic XP Mode for the Start Menu. MSFT has "classic" modes because the upgrades sucked.
|
|