|
Post by wheeles on Nov 14, 2012 17:59:53 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART: I turned off my adblocker so I could see the saucy ads people were talking about, and all I got were pictures of chubby people advertising weight-loss products and get rich quick schemes.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 14, 2012 18:08:05 GMT -8
Birdie: ROFLMAO!!!
|
|
|
Post by nathanstevens on Nov 14, 2012 19:42:34 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART: I turned off my adblocker so I could see the saucy ads people were talking about, and all I got were pictures of chubby people advertising weight-loss products and get rich quick schemes. Wheelies, Great charts. I noticed that you have MACD (3,10,0 and 5,34,7) in your charts. What is the motivation for that? When is it beneficial compared to the default 12,26,9? I've typically used 12,26,9 and 8,17,9 on a daily scale. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by wheeles on Nov 15, 2012 3:10:40 GMT -8
I turned off my adblocker so I could see the saucy ads people were talking about, and all I got were pictures of chubby people advertising weight-loss products and get rich quick schemes. Wheelies, Great charts. I noticed that you have MACD (3,10,0 and 5,34,7) in your charts. What is the motivation for that? When is it beneficial compared to the default 12,26,9? I've typically used 12,26,9 and 8,17,9 on a daily scale. Thanks That's not my chart. I don't understand why people choose to deviate from standard/optimal settings on studies, either. I don't see how it gives any advantage.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 15, 2012 8:38:51 GMT -8
Wheelies, Great charts. I noticed that you have MACD (3,10,0 and 5,34,7) in your charts. What is the motivation for that? When is it beneficial compared to the default 12,26,9? I've typically used 12,26,9 and 8,17,9 on a daily scale. Thanks Birdie, new nickname, heehee. Nathan, for my Stockcharts.com template only, I use the two more sensitive MACD-h indicators to: 1) visually exaggerate the move so I can see it better (3,10,0) and; 2) potentially flag something before it appears on the standard setting (5,34,7), which of course can lead to false signals. I learned (3,10,0) from Corey Rosenbloom and (5,34,7) from Alexander Elder.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 15, 2012 17:46:22 GMT -8
Any year now... We have CLEAR bullish divergence here... AAPL DAILY CHART:
|
|
|
Post by mbeauch on Nov 16, 2012 7:31:07 GMT -8
Any year now... We have CLEAR bullish divergence here... AAPL DAILY CHART: Lovey, it has been growing, but the stock continues down. It appears that the market has perfected creating false signals. The stock is broken. People, AAPL is trading for 4x cash. That is not irrational, that is insane. Not even sure ow it is possible.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 16, 2012 7:34:03 GMT -8
I regularly hate this stock.
|
|
|
Post by mbeauch on Nov 16, 2012 7:35:49 GMT -8
I regularly hate this stock. You are not alone.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 16, 2012 16:11:03 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART:
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 19, 2012 17:46:23 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART:
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Nov 19, 2012 18:27:13 GMT -8
Funny how MACD-h can quickly change course during exceptional circumstances. Say, a 60 point bounce from a (likely) downtrend bottom.
|
|
|
Post by Big Al on Nov 20, 2012 2:06:32 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART: Could this be a bull trap as in late April?
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 20, 2012 2:30:36 GMT -8
Al, we are much further into the correction -- time and scale -- here versus there. So, I am inclined to think odds favor the real deal versus yet another trap.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 20, 2012 7:36:51 GMT -8
Daily MACD-h bullish cross confirmed! AAPL DAILY CHART:
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Nov 20, 2012 7:53:13 GMT -8
AAPL may need to rest a bit after this. But no bad thing!
MACD-h = potentially helpful tailwind.
|
|
|
Post by mbeauch on Nov 20, 2012 8:12:32 GMT -8
A pause after yesterday is not surprising. Just curious about that PM/BS. It is like they printed the top which was not bought up to in the open market. Question is, does it drop below 556?
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 20, 2012 17:40:56 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART (with my notes):
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Nov 20, 2012 18:17:18 GMT -8
So far, so good.
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Nov 20, 2012 21:32:31 GMT -8
iPad, in case you don't see on Intraday: I think MB had a question about the 50/200-day bearish cross possibility.
"Does it matter"?
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 25, 2012 13:08:50 GMT -8
iPad, in case you don't see on Intraday: I think MB had a question about the 50/200-day bearish cross possibility. "Does it matter"? We do have a slight cross, and while that sucks, at this point, let's watch the progression of price...see which MAs price can leapfrog. Take it level by level.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 25, 2012 13:10:57 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART: MACD-h reading, until proven otherwise: Short-term upwave in short-term uptrend in intermediate-term downtrend/consolidation period.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 26, 2012 14:28:54 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART:
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 28, 2012 14:22:07 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART: We have a bullish cross with EMA-13 and SMA-20. HOORAY!! Two of the more sensitive MACD-h indicators show negative-sloping mountain = downwave in an uptrend. While it would be most bullish to stay above EMA-13, retrace to SMA-20 is perfectly fine. Should we retrace to SMA-20, I would expect buy orders parked there, potentially fueling a positive feedback loop. Losing SMA-20, however, is not so fine. Sell orders parked below there would potentially fuel a negative feedback loop.
|
|
|
Post by rutgersguy92 on Nov 28, 2012 16:07:02 GMT -8
Then Avi's call could happen.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Nov 30, 2012 15:11:44 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART:
|
|
|
Post by anthonytsai on Dec 2, 2012 14:16:32 GMT -8
An update to my previous chart. I add possible resistance trendlines. I don't feel that AAPL can break them without expansion of buy volume.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Dec 2, 2012 17:23:13 GMT -8
Thanks, Anthony!!
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Dec 2, 2012 17:24:17 GMT -8
Here's an update of mine... AAPL TWO-DAY CHART: (trendlines)
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Dec 3, 2012 15:07:38 GMT -8
AAPL DAILY CHART: A few notes: 1) While the slope of the MACD-h mountain is negative (short-term: downwave in an uptrend), MACD red line is *very* close to crossing above center/zero line, which would get us back to "intermediate-term uptrend." 2) See the confluence around the (non-div adjusted) daily SMA-20, the red downtrend line, and the current 38.2% retrace spot. Not saying we're necessarily headed there, but just note there's quite the confluence.
|
|