Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:45:38 GMT -8
Time for... Attachments:
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Aug 5, 2013 23:50:36 GMT -8
What the heck IS that? Oh, I see:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2013 23:53:10 GMT -8
BREAKOUT!
Lol - love those old Atari cartridge pictures.
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Aug 5, 2013 23:54:18 GMT -8
Safe to delete that last post. I figured it out.
|
|
|
Post by mace on Aug 6, 2013 0:03:30 GMT -8
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Aug 6, 2013 0:12:00 GMT -8
Great. My calls are now hosed. Thanks, mace. Damn that monkey..
|
|
aapldamus
Member
"Miss Cleo ain't got NOTHING on me!"
Posts: 64
|
Post by aapldamus on Aug 6, 2013 0:51:03 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by appledoc on Aug 6, 2013 1:14:31 GMT -8
Appreciate any comments from Ms. IPad, Doc or Mace on this, and what exactly does it mean in terms of AAPL's stock price (e.g., would this be in agreement with the Super Bull count)? Will comment on this in more detail in the EW thread tonight after work.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 2:46:15 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Aug 6, 2013 3:41:20 GMT -8
I don't see any tractor beam + with this. But for God's sake, you're the Captain! What I meant is that APPL trades $3.05/sh lower on Thursday than it will at the close Wednesday, whatever that is. I'm curious how the option markets figure this....are the 470 calls priced right now as if they were 466.95 of value? I suppose I could just look at the prices, but as captain I have people for that. Riker! Theoretically, should be moving toward being priced in, such that by the time it happens, no discernible difference. Theoretically.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Aug 6, 2013 3:45:35 GMT -8
Appreciate any comments from Ms. IPad, Doc or Mace on this, and what exactly does it mean in terms of AAPL's stock price (e.g., would this be in agreement with the Super Bull count)? Will comment on this in more detail in the EW thread tonight after work. +1 ;D
|
|
|
Post by artman1033 on Aug 6, 2013 4:27:34 GMT -8
BEZO’s buying a lot of political influence. And we can’t discard the fact that Amazon hasn’t been an enormous player, at least up until the dispute over sales taxes, and in buying The Washington Post, he has a seat at the table. And I think particularly legislators and anti-trust regulators are gonna be weighing the dominance of Amazon a lot in the years ahead.
|
|
|
Post by lovemyipad on Aug 6, 2013 5:00:13 GMT -8
Heads up for anyone with bull call spreads (especially front month) with the short leg ITM (especially deep ITM). Ex-div shenanigans could have you assigned on the short leg after hours on Wednesday such that you will find yourself short shares of AAPL on Thursday and responsible for paying a dividend that you will not receive as your actions (exercising your long legs or selling those calls and buying to cover your short shares) will be too late for settlement by the record date.
Potential preemptive solutions:
1) Roll up and out; 2) Swap for bull put spreads
|
|
|
Post by BillH on Aug 6, 2013 5:39:22 GMT -8
BEZO’s buying a lot of political influence. And we can’t discard the fact that Amazon hasn’t been an enormous player, at least up until the dispute over sales taxes, and in buying The Washington Post, he has a seat at the table. And I think particularly legislators and anti-trust regulators are gonna be weighing the dominance of Amazon a lot in the years ahead. I think the "tables" inhabited by a bunch of clueless old white guys and Steve was quite right in leaving his iPhone on "ignore".
|
|
|
Post by lance on Aug 6, 2013 5:45:52 GMT -8
200 day MA first big battle in a while is approaching. 200 day MA is 475 and falling.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 6:05:45 GMT -8
The art gallery owners are putting their business at risk with Amazon, if the outcome entices artists to market their paintings online.
|
|
|
Post by prazan on Aug 6, 2013 6:16:32 GMT -8
The art gallery owners are putting their business at risk with Amazon, if the outcome entices artists to market their paintings online. The artists most inclined to market their work online are those less likely to be represented by a major gallery. The dealer-artist relationship is a complex one. Big money sales in fine art are driven by galleries, the owners serving as guides to deep-pocketed clients wealthy enough to drop $25K and more on a painting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 6:16:42 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by lance on Aug 6, 2013 7:03:54 GMT -8
Battle lost with 200 day MA. Next is look on downside Lots of MA support between 430-445. I think it would be a great place to buying back more
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 7:13:00 GMT -8
I don't see today's trading as a problem. Daily average volume has dropped from December quarter (Oct earnings to Jan earnings) 21,xxx to today's 10,xxx. There are no Buyers and, more importantly, there are no Sellers. WS is sitting on its hands, biding its time before making a move pre-October earnings. Look for it mid September.
|
|
|
Post by terps530 on Aug 6, 2013 7:28:38 GMT -8
Battle lost with 200 day MA. Next is look on downside Lots of MA support between 430-445. I think it would be a great place to buying back more yes lets give up after going basically straight up and getting near it for the first time. i don't think we drop nearly to that level after just the first test. i'll give you 430-445 after 3 unsuccessful tries at 475.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 7:30:53 GMT -8
BEZO’s buying a lot of political influence. And we can’t discard the fact that Amazon hasn’t been an enormous player, at least up until the dispute over sales taxes, and in buying The Washington Post, he has a seat at the table. And I think particularly legislators and anti-trust regulators are gonna be weighing the dominance of Amazon a lot in the years ahead. I think we are being short sighted if we believe this is about buying influence. By purchasing WP outside of Amazon, Bezos can now sell WP content to Amazon for $50 Million per year (returning the franchise to profitability), and resell that content to Amazon customers for $25 Million and online advertisers for another $25 Million. Local subscribers get free access to the online version (there's an App for that). That isn't meant to be funny. WS will reward AMZN with a higher multiple as it broadens its product line, despite the fact that Amazon won't make a profit on the deal.
|
|
|
Post by mightydog on Aug 6, 2013 7:43:52 GMT -8
BEZO’s buying a lot of political influence. And we can’t discard the fact that Amazon hasn’t been an enormous player, at least up until the dispute over sales taxes, and in buying The Washington Post, he has a seat at the table. And I think particularly legislators and anti-trust regulators are gonna be weighing the dominance of Amazon a lot in the years ahead. I think we are being short sighted if we believe this is about buying influence. By purchasing WP outside of Amazon, Bezos can now sell WP content to Amazon for $50 Million per year (returning the franchise to profitability), and resell that content to Amazon customers for $25 Million and online advertisers for another $25 Million. Local subscribers get free access to the online version (there's an App for that). That isn't meant to be funny. WS will reward AMZN with a higher multiple as it broadens its product line, despite the fact that Amazon won't make a profit on the deal. And here I thought he would sell back issues to Amazon to use as packing materials for their boxes.
|
|
|
Post by Red Shirted Ensign on Aug 6, 2013 7:52:37 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Red Shirted Ensign on Aug 6, 2013 9:41:57 GMT -8
iOS 7 Beta 5 is out....Mercel, get it loaded up
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 6, 2013 10:12:16 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by tuffett on Aug 6, 2013 11:03:50 GMT -8
I much prefer the cleaner look of the Settings page on previous betas. I guess they had to do this though to make it consistent with other app icons.
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Aug 6, 2013 11:31:28 GMT -8
Based on those continuous FSC chimes and e-mails I'm getting, AAPL keeps going over and under that accelerated trendline.
Super-micro-wise, I'd like AAPL to stay above 465.75 by the close. I guess the market's supposed to adjust AAPL by $3.05 by Thursday, but I have no idea how that'll play out.
|
|
|
Post by prazan on Aug 6, 2013 11:43:09 GMT -8
Based on those continuous FSC chimes and e-mails I'm getting, AAPL keeps going over and under that accelerated trendline. Super-micro-wise, I'd like AAPL to stay above 465.75 by the close. I guess the market's supposed to adjust AAPL by $3.05 by Thursday, but I have no idea how that'll play out. Are you measuring from 7/23? There's another one from the 6/28 low that looks more sustainable, if not as exciting.
|
|
Mav
Member
[img style="max-width:100%;" alt=" " src="http://www.forumup.it/images/smiles/simo.gif"]
Posts: 10,784
|
Post by Mav on Aug 6, 2013 11:48:30 GMT -8
I have an accelerated trendline that's just what it says on the tin. Breaking below it wouldn't mean disaster. But it's due to intersect with my top primary trendline soon. That might be useful to measure micro composure.
My primary trendlines are a parallel price channel (about 40 points). AAPL is actually still trading above it following yesterday's breakout, though not by much.
|
|